James Ensor, The Fall of the Rebel Angels
About this video
Dr. Beth Harris and curator Dr. Herwig Todts look closely at James Ensor's The Fall of the Rebel Angels, a seemingly chaotic, almost abstract battle in the sky drawn from the book of Revelation. Todts explains that Ensor, though not religious, was obsessed with evil and human cruelty, provoked his own avant-garde group Les Vingt, and carefully prepared his 'chaos' with underpainting while borrowing from John Martin and the French Impressionists.
You'll be able to
- describe what can be seen when looking closely at The Fall of the Rebel Angels.
- explain why Ensor was interested in evil even though he was not religious.
- explain how the painting's chaos was actually carefully planned and drew on earlier sources.
Key words
- Book of Revelation
- The last book of the Christian Bible, describing a final battle between good and evil.
- Avant-garde
- Artists who push new, experimental ideas ahead of mainstream taste.
- Les Vingt
- 'The Twenty', a Belgian avant-garde artists' group that Ensor led and sometimes mocked.
- Underpainting
- A thin first layer of paint used to plan where figures will go.
- Expressionist
- Using bold colour and brushwork to express strong feeling rather than to copy reality.
Transcript
Dr. Beth Harris: We're standing in the Royal Museum of Fine Arts in Antwerp, in front of a painting by James Ensor, "The Fall of the Rebel Angels." This is a painting that requires close looking. Dr. Herwig Todts: It almost seems an abstract, informal, expressionist painting. It seems a sort of chaotic image with patches of color, and you have to get close to recognize legs and arms and demons flying, angels flying. And slowly you will discover, for instance, the dragon with its seven heads who is fighting with the archangel, and you will see a group of masked figures celebrating carnival. And then in the lower right, you have an almost apocalyptic scene with nudes that are drowning, and then you have to move back to see that we have a
seascape, and it's above this seascape in the sky that this chaotic, violent event is taking place. Dr. Harris: A battle in heaven between the forces of good and the forces of evil. This is drawn from the Hebrew Bible, from the Christian Bible, specifically the book of Revelation, but in a way those forces are not what Ensor is interested in.
Dr. Todts: Ensor was not a religious person. He did not believe in God and Christ. He was intrigued by Christ. He was intrigued by all these late medieval representations of heaven and hell, and like most modern artists and modern audience, he was fascinated by demons and by getting driven by your impulses, by lust, by greed. He is fascinated and obsessed with evil. Why are we evil? How can men on the one hand be rational and at the same time be cruel? And that explains, I think to a certain extent, a painting such as The Fall of the Rebel Angels, because it's a pessimistic view of the world and of mankind. Dr. Harris: And as you look closer and closer, different heads and faces emerge, weapons, and then interestingly, this green banner
with two Xs, that is the symbol for Les Vingt, the avant garde artist's organization that Ensor was a leading member of, although he also had his disagreements with them. Dr. Todts: You have this almost provocation with Les Vingt, referring to this group as a sort of group of carnival celebrators. He could be very provocative, challenging his best friends to see, how far can I go? Dr. Harris: Well, those were artists who were asserting an avant garde status, for example, Fernand Khnopff, but whose work looks to me so conservative next to a painting as expressive, as violent in its brushwork as this one.
And yet, it's not as though everything here is spontaneous. This is a very careful composition. Dr. Todts: And when you look very closely, you will see that almost all the figures have been prepared with a thin, bluish underpainting, just indicating here will I have a carriage, there I will have another figure, there I will have a mask.
So, it's a very well prepared sort of chaos. Dr. Harris: So many layers upon layers of paint, and yet at the same time, areas where the paint is thin and we can see the canvas beneath it. Dr. Todts: And here and there, it seems that he might have simply tried to turn an informal patch into a figure, a mask, a face. But as a whole, it's indeed very well prepared.
What is the most important characteristic of Ensor is that he dared to be very radical. If we're going to do something like Hieronymus Bosch, but in a modern way, this is what I propose. He used different sources. For instance, this composition comes from John Martin, and the colors and the technique comes from the French Impressionists.
Dr. Harris: The Impressionist interest in Parisian leisure couldn't be further from the kind of grandiose vision that Ensor had for his own art. Dr. Todts: Once again, he turns it into something so different that has indeed nothing to do with this optimistic Impressionist world where we all would like to live. But Ensor is almost telling us, that is not the real world. The real world is about evil.
It's a painting where evil is very strong and present, and what he tries to do is turn this chaotic evil into something that is so spectacular that you get carried away, indeed, in a sort of blissful ecstasy, in a sort of blissful aesthetic experience.
Video © Khan Academy, used under CC BY-NC-SA. Watch on Khan Academy. Puzzicle is not affiliated with Khan Academy.