Was the Boston Massacre a turning point in the road to the American Revolution?

Learn this with friends

History & humanitiesConstitution 1013:493 check-ins✎ Fixed a slip
✎ We fixed a slip in this video

Caption says the Boston Massacre was in 'the winter of 1770 in December'; it happened on 5 March 1770. The month was not used in any question.

The check-ins use the correct version. The video is Khan Academy's, unchanged.

About this video

The historian explains that after 1763 Britain kept about 10,000 troops in North America, far out on the frontier. After the Stamp Act riots and boycotts, troops were moved into colonial cities, especially New York and Boston, to stop resistance, and the army went from a respected institution to a symbol of oppression. Economic competition and tension in Boston built up until soldiers fired on a crowd in 1770, killing five Bostonians and making colonists question who their real enemy was.

You'll be able to

  • explain why British troops were moved from the frontier into colonial cities.
  • explain how colonists' view of the British army changed over time.
  • describe the tensions in Boston that led to the Boston Massacre.
  • explain why the Boston Massacre shocked colonists who saw themselves as British.

Key words

Frontier
The far edge of settled land, where colonists lived near Native American lands.
Standing army
A permanent army kept even in peacetime, which colonists feared could be used against citizens.
Boycott
Refusing to buy goods as a form of protest.
Townshend Acts
British laws taxing goods imported into the colonies; troops were sent to Boston to stop resistance to them.
Powder keg
A tense situation that could explode into violence at any moment.
Transcript

Countless want the books troops to skip. The assumption isn't if you keep 10,000 British troops until about 25,000 [inaudible] 10,000 in North America. All of them station very far away from any British anything back and so on. All the API wanted mountains road, Western Pennsylvania. What's interesting is that Athens Stamp Act riots and then after the boycott movement and things began to escalate. In 1766-1768, the British begin to become less and less concerned about policing with frontier. Thousands of instruments are moved eastward into colonial cities, and they're moved into the hottest spots. New York in particularly Boston.

Now, this leads to real concern and anger about the presence of military personnel, in the presence of civilians and being used to presumably silence them, intimidate them available [inaudible]. Agaib what I want to suggest is that it's not inevitable. The colonial Americans will hate the British military. It's not inevitable that they will feel the British military is a threatening force of oppression. What it is the connective total, complicated story of how and why they came to experience the military. During the seven years of war, they really live here, the military. They're paying for the cost of the military.

They're going to put our troops, they work side-by-side with British officers and men. There's a real sense of camaraderie, particularly between American quinone map. You can deficient. In 1763, they want 10,000 troops terminating community. They're willing to cool them. But it is the case that by the time you're now moving into say, Boston and seven and six feet, eight and six long and while they're there to try and prevent people from resisting the Townsend Acts, were denouncing the dissolution of the British military. What had been a revered institution. It was seen as an instrument of British power and liberty against the truth retroactively. At around that you're going to get real concerns

about radio standing armies, are they knew the presence of the military and civilian populations, even that it was inevitable. But increasingly that seems to be a better way to understand things because of the action with loans between 1760 and 1761. This becomes a real powder keg.

There's lineal Patriots by 1769 and 1770 among the Boston population and the British molten. That's in the case of the Boston economy isn't doing well and a lot of British military duty and work in civilian occupations. They can undercut Boston labeling them is because they're getting payments, verbs, military personnel as well, so they can earn less money from what VT jobs. Lots of tensions between colonial Boston dockworkers, Boston laborers, the British military. There's really builds to a head in the winter of 1770 in December. Secondly, leads to a concentration on where a large crowd and Muslims surrounds a small contingent evaluation routine. In this confusing mess and writing, someone seems to shout fire a little British, hear them shine fire.

Several trips to filing with the class, showing five Bostonians and ROI and the three Blackman. This leads to a sense that something has happened and hadn't happened. Which is the British subject who the king and his army to fight other British Institute is indicating citizens of Boston who believe themselves to be eaten we British enabling water, and now they have to question whether France and the Catholic menace is really the biggest spectrum and what the needs are, whether it's their own cloud and they're alone. I wouldn't say that's a quantum. Well, the churn lobby was put on Millikan comes in later, but that's part of why the Townsend Acts places, I would argue is a severe escalation of the conflict and attention over with the staffing plans.

Video © Khan Academy, used under CC BY-NC-SA. Watch on Khan Academy. Puzzicle is not affiliated with Khan Academy.