What did the Supreme Court say about the right to counsel in Gideon v. Wainwright?

Learn this with friends

History & humanitiesConstitution 1012:503 check-ins✎ Fixed a slip
✎ We fixed a slip in this video

The speaker dates Gideon v. Wainwright to '1961, I think it was'; it was decided in 1963. No intervention tests the date.

The check-ins use the correct version. The video is Khan Academy's, unchanged.

About this video

The video explains how the right to counsel grew as trials became more complex, leading to Gideon v. Wainwright, where the Supreme Court held that the government must provide a lawyer to defendants who can't afford one. It tells the story of Clarence Earl Gideon, who was convicted when he defended himself and acquitted at a retrial once he had a lawyer.

You'll be able to

  • explain why the Supreme Court decided poor defendants must be given a lawyer.
  • retell how Gideon's case shows the difference a lawyer makes.

Key words

right to counsel
The Sixth Amendment right to have a lawyer help defend you in a criminal case.
cross-examination
When a lawyer questions the other side's witness to test their story.
retrial
A new trial of the same case, often after an appeal.
acquitted
Found not guilty by the jury.
Transcript

It's the ability to have a lawyer help you. Now, as I mentioned, through the 17th century, most defendants represented themselves, but people had the right to hire a lawyer if they wanted. At the time, there wasn't much in the rules of evidence and procedure, but our rules have become increasingly complex and technical as lawyers really took over and ran the show over the course of the 19th century. By the time we get to the middle of the 20th century, trials have become too complicated, and everyone who has the money can hire a lawyer for himself or herself. So in a series of cases from the 1930s until Gideon v. Wainwright in 1961, I think it was, the Supreme Court held that whenever you are charged with a crime, a crime that can result in your being put in jail, felonies, and then later they said misdemeanors. If you can't afford a lawyer,

the government has to give one to you. You have to show that you can't afford it. But if you can't and the prosecution has a prosecuting lawyer, then to even the scales, we have to give a defense lawyer to the defendant, because these days, with so many rules of evidence and procedure and jury instructions, it's really hard to try your own case before a jury. The Supreme Court had started with some of the most serious cases, some young Black men who were being railroaded and facing the death penalty in the hostile South. But by the time we get to Clarence Earl Gideon was a small-time thief. He had been accused of breaking into a pool hole and stealing a bunch of coins from I think a vending machine. He put on his own defense about as well as he could. He tried to question the government's main witness. The government's main witness had said,

No, I saw him coming out of there. His pockets were full of change and he said, I've won that change of a poker game, but he got convicted. Well, the Supreme Court appointed a lawyer for him, and the lawyer made the point that our system is now too complicated for him to defend himself. The Supreme Court recognized that the Sixth Amendment guarantees a lawyer for him just because he's charged with a serious crime.

They sent the case back down. He got a lawyer. At the retrial, the lawyer got the government's main witness on Cross, destroyed his story, and pointed to him as the likely culprit. The government's witness was the one who was blaming Gideon to deflect blame from himself. So on retrial with a lawyer to Pokhles in the story, the jury acquitted Gideon. Gideon Trumpet is a wonderful book about that recognizing the rights of even the poorest people to have a fair shake in a defense.

Video © Khan Academy, used under CC BY-NC-SA. Watch on Khan Academy. Puzzicle is not affiliated with Khan Academy.