First Amendment | Constitution 101
About this video
Jeffrey Rosen explains four reasons the founders protected free speech: freedom of conscience is unalienable, free speech keeps representatives accountable, it helps discover truth, and it enables democratic self-government. He traces these reasons through Jefferson's Virginia Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom and Justice Brandeis's 1927 opinion in Whitney v. California, whose test was adopted in 1969, and asks whether social media challenges this faith in reason.
You'll be able to
- state the four reasons the founders gave for protecting free speech.
- explain why Jefferson thought freedom of conscience is unalienable.
- describe Brandeis's test for when speech can be banned.
- evaluate how social media challenges the First Amendment's faith in reason.
Key words
- freedom of conscience
- The right to think and believe what you choose.
- unalienable right
- A right so basic it can't be given up or handed to the government.
- established church
- A church officially supported and required by the government.
- imminent
- About to happen very soon.
- Alien and Sedition Acts
- 1798 laws that made it a crime to criticize President John Adams's government.
- filter bubble
- An online space where you only see opinions you already agree with.
Transcript
[Music] i'm jeffrey rosen and i'm here at the national constitution center in front of the first amendment tablet let's talk about why the founders believed that congress can make no law abridging the freedom of speech press religion assembly and petition well they had four reasons which have been developed by the supreme court over the course of american history first freedom of conscience is an unalienable right because people have the right and the duty to think for themselves second free speech makes our representatives accountable to we the people third free speech is necessary for the discovery of truth and the rejection of falsehood and fourth free speech allows the public discussion necessary for democratic self-government remarkably all four
of these reasons are clearly and brilliantly expressed in two texts that we're going to talk about today thomas jefferson's original draft of his virginia bill for establishing religious freedom from 1777 and justice brandeis's opinion in whitney versus california from 1927.
let's begin with jefferson's bill which he drafted after returning to virginia from philadelphia when he wrote the declaration of independence jefferson considered his religious freedom bill among the three most important accomplishments of his life important enough to be inscribed on his tombstone along with his having drafted the declaration of independence and founded the university of virginia under virginia's colonial religious code at the time all dissenters were required to support and attend the established anglican church presbyterians and baptists could be arrested for practicing their faith or preaching the gospel quakers and jews and other dissenters could be denied the freedom to marry or
to have custody of their own children jefferson proposed not only to disestablish the anglican church and remove all criminal punishments for dissent but also to prohibit all compelled support for religion of any kind he concluded that because freedom of conscience is a fundamental right government can regulate overt acts against peace and good order but it lacks all power to intrude into the field of opinion let's review each of jefferson's four reasons first freedom of conscience is an unalienable right because people have the right and the duty to think for themselves jefferson said well aware that the opinions and beliefs of men depend not on their own will but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to
their minds god have created the mind free and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it all together insusceptible of restraint in other words jefferson argued freedom of conscience is by definition an unalienable right one that can't be alienated or surrendered to government because our opinions are the involuntary result of the evidence contemplated by our reasoning minds we can't give presidents or priests or teachers or fellow citizens the power to think for us even if we wanted to because we are endowed by our creator with the capacity to reason and therefore we can't help thinking for ourselves second free speech makes our representatives accountable to we the people in his religious freedom bill
jefferson emphasized that it's crucial in a democracy for citizens to be able to criticize public officials because legislators and religious leaders being themselves fallible and uninspired as jefferson said will always try to impose their own opinions and modes of thinking on others jefferson's prediction came to a head in the controversy over the alien and sedition acts in 1798 when the federalist congress made it a crime to criticize the federalist president john adams but not the republican vice president thomas jefferson third free speech is necessary for the discovery of truth and the rejection of falsehood jefferson concludes his religious freedom bill with words expressing his unshakable faith in the power of
reason and reasoned deliberation to distinguish truth from error and the words that he used are inscribed in marble on the jefferson memorial in washington truth is great and will prevail if left to herself she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error and has nothing to fear from the conflict unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons free argument and debate fourth free speech allows the public discussion necessary for democratic self-government jefferson believed that in a democracy all citizens have an equal right and responsibility to exercise their rights of conscience as he put it in the virginia bill proscribing any citizen as unworthy the public confidence by laying upon him an incapacity of
being called to offices of trust and a monument unless he professes or renounces this or that religious opinion is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and advantages to which in common with his fellow citizens he has a natural right in 1927 in the greatest free speech opinion of the 20th century justice louis brandeis distilled jefferson's four reasons for protecting free speech into a few inspiring paragraphs the case was called whitney versus california and here we see the first jewish justice insisting on the right of anita whitney a white woman to make a speech defending anti-lynching laws which were designed to protect the life and liberty of african americans whitney made her speech at a communist party meeting and she was
convicted under a california law that made it a crime to associate with organizations that advocated doctrines that might lead people to break the law in 1926 brandeis had read jefferson's original draft of the virginia bill for establishing religious freedom and in his whitney opinion the following year brandeis adopted and refined jefferson's standard for ensuring that government could only punish overt acts of law breaking and not the expression of dangerous opinions as brandeis put it in whitney fear of serious injury cannot alone justify suppression of free speech and assembly men feared witches and burnt women it is the function of speech to free men from the bondage of irrational fears to justify suppression of free speech
there must be reasonable ground to fear that serious evil will result if free speech is practiced and there must be reasonable ground to believe that the danger apprehended is imminent brandeis is inspiring test for protecting free speech namely government can only ban speech if it's intended to and likely to cause imminent and serious injury was based on his jeffersonian faith in the power of what he called free and fearless reasoning to expose falsehood through public discussion as brandeis put it if there be time to expose through discussion the falsehoods and fallacies to avert the evil by the processes of education the remedy to be applied is more speech not enforced silence only an emergency can justify repression
brandeis's test was finally adopted by the supreme court in 1969 in the brandenburg case and as a result the u.s supreme court and the united states of america now protect free speech more vigorously than any other country in the world brandeis went on in whitney to summarize jefferson's four reasons for why government can't make laws designed to restrict free speech and in the process brandeis achieved a kind of constitutional poetry i'm now going to read brandeis's central passage listen closely for each of jefferson's four reasons here we go those who won our independence believed that the final end of the state was to make men free to develop their faculties and that in its government the deliberative
forces should prevail over the arbitrary they valued liberty both as an end and as a means they believed liberty to be the secret of happiness and courage to be the secret of liberty that's a quotation from pericles funeral origin they believe that freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think are means indispensable to the discovery and spread of political truth that without free speech and assembly discussion would be futile that with them discussion affords ordinarily adequate protection against the dissemination of noxious doctrine that the greatest threat to freedom is an inert people that public discussion is a political duty and that this should be a fundamental principle of the american government well that's the most inspiring paragraph on free speech ever written
but as that paragraph shows all four of jefferson and brandeis's reasons for protecting free speech are based in an overwhelming faith in reason itself the first amendment is based on that faith that people will take time to develop their faculties of reason through education and public discussion that public discussion will be a check on arbitrary and partisan demagogues rather than enabling them that more speech will lead to the spread of more truth rather than more falsehood and that people will in fact take time for discussion and deliberation rather than making impulsive decisions all four of these founding faiths are being challenged in a polarized age of social media which is based on a business model of enrage and engage
twitter and facebook and other platforms have accelerated public discourse to warp speed creating virtual versions of the mob inflammatory posts based on passion travel farther and faster than arguments based on reason and rather than encouraging deliberation mass media can undermine it by creating filter bubbles and echo chambers in which citizens see only those opinions they already embrace for these reasons some are calling for america's free speech tradition to be reconsidered or amended here at the national constitution center in front of the first amendment tablet we are proud to preserve protect and defend the faith in reasoned deliberation that is the foundation of the freedom of conscience protected by the first amendment which encompasses the five freedoms
of speech press religion petition and assembly as america's leading platform for non-partisan constitutional education and debate we bring together americans of different perspectives to cultivate their faculties of reason only by listening to the best arguments on all sides of the constitutional questions at the center of american life can you exercise your right and duty to make up your own mind like jefferson and brandeis and frederick douglass and ruth bader ginsburg and all of these great free speech heroes of american history we are dedicated to what jefferson called the illimitable freedom of the human mind for here as jefferson said we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it
Video © Khan Academy, used under CC BY-NC-SA. Watch on Khan Academy. Puzzicle is not affiliated with Khan Academy.